From NeuroLex

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "NeuroLex FAQ": Excessive spamming ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
(What are some best practices for choosing the name of a new concept?)
Line 38: Line 38:
==What are some best practices for choosing the name of a new concept?==
==What are some best practices for choosing the name of a new concept?==
Names need to be unique.
Names need to be unique.  Although Neurolex will accept special characters, avoid them if possible.  The comma is particularly problematic, as some fields accept multiple entries separated by commas.
===Names for brain regions===
===Names for brain regions===

Revision as of 08:41, 31 January 2012


What is a category page? What is a page?

The NeuroLex is built using something called the Semantic MediaWiki. We chose this platform because it makes it easier to go between the formal ontologies and the Wiki space. It can be a little confusing to get started and to understand its structure. We have created several video tutorials explaining the structure of the NeuroLex and how to edit it. These tutorials are available from the page, How to Contribute to the NeuroLex. We'll be adding more in the future.

How are categories related to one another in NeuroLex?

NeuroLex was designed as a single tree hierarchy, that is, a given category has one and only one parent category (super category) and one or more children categories. A category is related to its parent and children through a "is a type of" relationship, also called an "is a" relationship. So, a Neuron "is a type of" Cell; a "Purkinje cell" is a type of" Neuron. In order to make sure that each Category is related to its parent only through an "is a" relationship, NeuroLex has created some contrived categories, e.g., Regional part of brain; Cytoarchitectural part of hippocampal formation". We are preparing some additional documents to provide the rationale for this design, but for now, they provide useful buckets into which we can place information. The next phase will be more tricky, as we define other relationships between categories that are necessary to build a network of neuroscience concepts. The NeuroLex lets you define other relationships between Categories, e.g., "Is part of"; "Located in"; "Neurotransmitter". For a list of these properties, please see Special pages. When you are defining relationships between categories, you should make sure that you use the correct relationship. The easiest way to do this, is to create a sentence with a subject (Category 1) a predicate (relationship) and an object (Category 2). The Thalamus "is part of" the Diencephalon.

How do I add a new class?

You can find a quick start guide here.

How is the NeuroLex different from Wikipedia or any other Wiki-based encyclopedia for neuroscience?

The NeuroLex is interested in defining the meaning of concepts and not in providing general information about the concept. It is a dictionary rather than an encyclopedia. We want to make explicit the way in which a concept is defined so that it can be consistently applied to data annotation. We aren't interested in creating the "right" definition of a term like basal ganglia, but to allow the community to tell us the many ways in which it is defined. Thus, we have created a definition template and some policies that allows the user to provide the required information in a form that's easy for automated agents to understand.

Do I need an account to contribute to the NeuroLex?

No, you do not need an account. We want the NeuroLex to provide a very low barrier entry point for you to contribute your knowledge. We view the NeuroLex as the marketplace of ideas for neuroscience concepts. However, if you do get an account, all of your contributions will be linked to you.

Is NeuroLex curated?

Yes, it is. We monitor the NeuroLex regularly. Some of the content of the NeuroLex is already being incorporated into our ontologies by knowledge engineers working on the NIF. We will certainly remove any content that is inappropriate (i.e., doesn't fall within our scope, is obscene or inflammatory). We will also update entries that have been incorporated into the NIFSTD ontologies so that the concept can recieve an appropriate version number. But the NeuroLex is meant to be a community resource and needs to evolve in a way that is useful to the community. So we will adjust our curation policies if necessary as we go.

What are some best practices for defining my new term?

The primary purpose of terms in Neurolex is for the annotation of data. Therefore, the definition should provide the meaning of the term in a way that distinguishes it from other related terms (monothetic) so that users will know how to apply that term to their data. We favor the Aristotelian approach: A "is a type of" B "which has" C. B gives the parent class (see above); C gives one or more properties that distinguishes that class from all other related classes.

Definitions for brain regions

When defining a brain region, the definition should include:

  • "Differentia" or what makes this brain region different from another brain region (Defining criteria)
  • The smallest "classical anatomical reference" that the brain region is contained within (Is part of)
  • Organism that it is observed in (Species)

We prefer that people add information in the fields specified in the form (field names in parentheses), but we will accept free text in the definition field containing the information above.

What are some best practices for choosing the name of a new concept?

Names need to be unique. Although Neurolex will accept special characters, avoid them if possible. The comma is particularly problematic, as some fields accept multiple entries separated by commas.

Names for brain regions

Area name first, and if needed, the reference the area comes from, labelled with the name of the first author and the year in parentheses.

  • ex: Area 10M of Ongur (2003)

What is NeuroNames?

NeuroNames is another name for the resource BrainInfo. This resource has a lot of information about brain regions, so we frequently link out to it. To find the NeuroNames ID for a brain region, simply use the search at the BrainInfo site to find the structure you are interested in. Once you click on one of the results that comes back to you, you'll go to a page with a URL like the following:

The NeuroNames ID is the number after "ID=" in the URL. If you put this number into a NeuroLex form when it is asked, it will link back to this page automatically.

How can I get a private page to play around with that won't affect the rest of the site?

  1. From the main page, click on the upper right hand corner link that says "log in / create account"
  2. Click the link where it says: Don't have a login? Create an account.
  3. Fill out the form, including the little word puzzle at the top that verifies you are a human :)
  4. Once you have created the account, click the same link again in the upper right to log in
  5. Once you are logged in, you should see several links in the upper right hand corner. One of them will have the user name that you have chosen (next a little icon of a person). Click your user name link.
  6. This is your private page. Any edits that you make here will not be visible to other users.

Why are there so many different types of brain parts?

There are many different ways to divide up the brain. Although Neurolex takes a structural approach, i.e., we haven't yet defined neural systems like the visual system, we are still left with gross anatomy, cytoarchitecture, chemoarchitecture and connectivity, to name a few. Neurolex is concerned with building formal vocabularies for information systems. We therefore have to make sure that we create our ontologies as cleanly as possible, without mixing up all of these different types of parts. However, we don't expect a naive user to navigate all of these complexities. We therefore set up a few different types of categories into which users can deposit their brain parts. We are still trying to determine whether this is a useful exercise or not, but so far it seems to be working. We have started a page where we document our current categories (

How can I get a list of the recent new categories?

  • Quick way: click here
  • Advanced way: From the new pages special page, select 'all' from the Namespace pull-down. It will show you the new categories that have been added recently. You may also filter out modifications to pages as you'd see in the recent changes list. Adding a user name to the form will let you look at new categories that a particular user name has added.

How can I see what categories have changed in a specific period of time?

Click here to see an example of how to see all classes that have changed after a particular date

What should I include in the description of a resource?

Copy or write a description of the resource, which will enable the general neuroscience public to discern whether or not the resource is likely to have the information that the person is looking for. This can often be obtained by reading the "about us" section of the resource. The first 3 sentences should contain the description of the resource and what one can get from it. An example is: CCDB is a database that contains high resolution images of cells For more information try and

What is a DISCO Sitemap and how do I generate one?

A DISCO Sitemap or Resource Description file is a service provided by the DISCO protocol that keeps your NIF Registry description up-to-date and informs search engines about your resource. DISCO can ingest many formats, such as the native "disco.rd", the NIF "disco.rd.nif.rdf" and the National Center for Biomedical Computing's Biositemap formats. Resource owners may login (upper right) and find their resource. Under the “Are you the owner of this resource?” section, click on the [Clink here to generate sitemap] link and follow the instructions.

Who can I contact with more questions?

Mailing list: neurolex at

Maryann Martone: maryann at

Stephen Larson: slarson at


*Note: Neurolex imports many terms and their ids from existing community ontologies, e.g., the Gene Ontology. Neurolex, however, is a dynamic site and any content beyond the identifier should not be presumed to reflect the content or views of the source ontology. Users should consult with the authoritative source for each ontology for current information.