arrow

From NeuroLex

Jump to: navigation, search
Category:Retina ganglion cell C1
Authors Huxlin KR  +, Goodchild AK  +
Curator Mihail Bota +
DefiningCitation Huxlin and Goodchild 1997  +
Definition Five RGc1 cells were labelled that have sm Five RGc1 cells were labelled that have small somata and large asymmetrical dendritic fields (Figs. 10A, 12). Although only a small number of them were labelled, they resemble the medial terminal nucleus (MTN) to projecting cells described by Dann and Buhl (1987). Compared with neurons in Group RGA, RGC1 cells have smaller cell bodies, a higher density of dendritic branching, and usually asymmetrical dendritic fields. The RGC1 cells exhibited smooth, small caliber, recursive dendrites extending from large primary ones. Dendritic field was of medium density (Fig. 6A). The RGC1 stratified mostly in the inner IPL. Their morphology is very similar to the MTN to projecting cells characterized by Dann and Buhl (1987). lls characterized by Dann and Buhl (1987).
Has default formThis property is a special property in this wiki. Petilla neuron  +
Id BAMSC1050  +
JournalNumber 2 +
JournalVolume 385 +
Label Retina ganglion cell C1  +
Located in Retina +, Ganglion cell layer +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 9 March 2012 01:22:29  +
ModifiedDate 9 March 2012  +
PMID 9268130  +
Page has default formThis property is a special property in this wiki. Petilla neuron  +
Pages 309-323
PublicationDate 1997 +
PublicationName Journal of Comparative Neurology +
SuperCategory retina ganglion cell C  +
Synonym retinal ganglion cell C1  +
Title Retinal ganglion cells in the albino rat: revised morphological classification.  +
Categories Retina C ganglion cell
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.

*Note: Neurolex imports many terms and their ids from existing community ontologies, e.g., the Gene Ontology. Neurolex, however, is a dynamic site and any content beyond the identifier should not be presumed to reflect the content or views of the source ontology. Users should consult with the authoritative source for each ontology for current information.